Perceptual evaluation of visual alerts in surveillance videos

Bernice E. Rogowitz; Mercan Topkara; William Pfeiffer; Arun Hampapur

doi:10.1117/12.2085802

17 March 2015 Perceptual evaluation of visual alerts in surveillance videos

Bernice E. Rogowitz, Mercan Topkara, William Pfeiffer, Arun Hampapur

Proceedings Volume 9394, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XX; 939413 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2085802
Event: SPIE/IS&T Electronic Imaging, 2015, San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Visual alerts are commonly used in video monitoring and surveillance systems to mark events, presumably making them more salient to human observers. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of computer-generated alerts in improving human performance has not been widely studied. To address this gap, we have developed a tool for simulating different alert parameters in a realistic visual monitoring situation, and have measured human detection performance under conditions that emulated different set-points in a surveillance algorithm. In the High-Sensitivity condition, the simulated alerts identified 100% of the events with many false alarms. In the Lower-Sensitivity condition, the simulated alerts correctly identified 70% of the targets, with fewer false alarms. In the control condition, no simulated alerts were provided. To explore the effects of learning, subjects performed these tasks in three sessions, on separate days, in a counterbalanced, within subject design. We explore these results within the context of cognitive models of human attention and learning. We found that human observers were more likely to respond to events when marked by a visual alert. Learning played a major role in the two alert conditions. In the first session, observers generated almost twice as many False Alarms as in the No-Alert condition, as the observers responded pre-attentively to the computer-generated false alarms. However, this rate dropped equally dramatically in later sessions, as observers learned to discount the false cues. Highest observer Precision, Hits/(Hits + False Alarms), was achieved in the High Sensitivity condition, but only after training. The successful evaluation of surveillance systems depends on understanding human attention and performance.

Citation Download Citation

Bernice E. Rogowitz, Mercan Topkara, William Pfeiffer, and Arun Hampapur "Perceptual evaluation of visual alerts in surveillance videos", Proc. SPIE 9394, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XX, 939413 (17 March 2015); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2085802

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members: $17.00

Non-members: $21.00 ADD TO CART

PROCEEDINGS
13 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

GET CITATION

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Get copyright permission Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace

KEYWORDS

Video surveillance

Visualization

Video

Detection and tracking algorithms

Surveillance

Surveillance systems

Computer simulations

Show All Keywords

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years