Review of reference metrology for nanotechnology: significance, challenges, and solutions

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev; G. William Banke Jr.

doi:10.1117/1.JMM.11.1.011010

27 February 2012 Review of reference metrology for nanotechnology: significance, challenges, and solutions

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev, G. William Banke Jr.

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 011010 (February 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.11.1.011010

Abstract

Metrology and control of critical dimensions (CDs) are key to the success of nanotechnology. Modern nanotechnology and nanometrology are largely based on knowledge developed during the last 10 to 20 years of semiconductor manufacturing. Semiconductor CD metrology entered the nanotechnology age in the late 1990s. Work on 130-nm- and 90-nm-node technologies led to the conclusion that precision alone is an insufficient metric for the quality assessment of metrology. Other components of measurement uncertainty (MU) must also be considered: 1. sample-to-sample measurement bias variation, 2. sampling uncertainty, and 3. sample variation induced by the probe-sample interaction. The first one (sample-dependent systematic error) is common for indirect and model-based CD metrologies such as top-down and cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scatterometry (OCD). Unless special measures are taken, bias variation of CDSEM and OCD could exceed several nanometers. Variation of bias and therefore MU can be assessed only if reference metrology (RM) is employed. The choice of RM tools is very limited. The CD atomic force microscope (AFM) is one of a few available RM tools. The CDAFM provides subnanometer MU for a number of nanometrology applications. Significant challenges of CDAFM remain, such as the following: 1. the finite dimensions of the probe are limiting characterization of narrow high-aspect spaces, 2. the flexibility of the probe complicates positioning control, 3. the probe apex sharpness limits 3D AFM resolution, 4. the lifetime of atomically sharp probes is too short, and 5. adsorbates change properties and dimensions of nanometer-sized objects considerably. We believe that solutions for the problems exist; therefore, we will discuss the role of RM in nanometrology, current RM choices, and the challenges of CDAFM as well as suggest some potential solutions.

Citation Download Citation

Vladimir A. Ukraintsev and G. William Banke Jr. "Review of reference metrology for nanotechnology: significance, challenges, and solutions," Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 11(1), 011010 (27 February 2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMM.11.1.011010

Published: 27 February 2012

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

;

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE