Presentation + Paper
23 April 2020 Comparison of different inspection techniques for fatigue cracks
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
For qualifying non-destructive inspection techniques, test blocks with reproducible cracks are necessary. Austenitic stainless steel samples with reference reflectors were created and compared with artificial fatigue cracks produced by a resonance testing machine. The samples were inspected by eddy current and ultrasonic testing to estimate their length and depth. Additionally, inductive thermography measurements were carried out. This method can be used to detect surface flaws in metallic materials. As the flaw depth influences the eddy current distribution and the heat diffusion, the temperature difference caused by a flaw correlates with its depth. The fatigue cracks become visible by evaluating the IR image sequence and by observing the typical ‘butterfly’ pattern. FEM simulations were used to model the thermography experiments. The signals of short and long cracks were compared to examine how the depth estimation derived for long cracks can also be applied for short fatigue cracks.
Conference Presentation
© (2020) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Beate Oswald-Tranta, Sascha Feistkorn, Gerd Rössler, and Michael Scherrer "Comparison of different inspection techniques for fatigue cracks", Proc. SPIE 11409, Thermosense: Thermal Infrared Applications XLII, 114090C (23 April 2020); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2556853
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Inspection

Manufacturing

Thermography

Phase measurement

Nondestructive evaluation

Scanning electron microscopy

Diffusion

Back to Top