PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
Fractal-based phase screens are compared to subharmonic-augmented FFT-based phase screens using both analytic and numerical statistical methods. Properties such as homogeneity and stationarity are investigated. It is shown analytically that augmented FFT-based screens are homogeneous and strict-sense stationary. Analytic means are also used to show that fractal-based phase screens are not stationary based on the definition of fractal Brownian surfaces. Corresponding numerical results show that the structure functions in both cases appear to be stationary or nearly so. It is shown that both types of phase screens must have “creasing” that has been observed in the power spectrum, due to edge effects. FFT-based screens without subharmonic augmentation, on the other hand, are shown to avoid such creasing. Sample results are also presented for imaging reconstructions with both types of screens.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
V. S. R. Gudimetla, D. Abercrombie, R. Holmes, "Statistical and imaging comparisons of FFT-based phase screens and fractal-based phase screens," Proc. SPIE 12239, Unconventional Imaging and Adaptive Optics 2022, 122390M (4 October 2022); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632776