|
1.Focus on EthicsProfessional organizations, funding agencies, and academics increasingly recognize the need to include explicit training in ethics and professional practice within STEM education; however, implementation of such training is varied.[1] The need is underscored by high-profile lapses in professional practice, including plagiarism, falsification, and fabrication, conflict of interest or commitment, failure to disclose, and violation of export- and international trade regulations.[2] Ethics frameworks help professionals understand the origin of rules, which may improve compliance, and provide a foundation for making good judgements when explicit rules are unavailable, as arises naturally with new technologies, like facial recognition, AI, and gene editing.[3] In 2014, CREOL launched the BS in photonic science and engineering, exceeding ABET standards by positioning ethics and professional development front and center in the curriculum (Fig. 1). Topics are threaded throughout coursework, labs, and capstone activities, and anchored in Frontiers in Optics, a required course dedicated entirely to ethical and professional practice. 2.Structure of Frontiers in Optics CourseFrontiers in Optics includes modules in 1) ethics and responsible conduct; 2) history and societal impact of optics; 3) structure of the industry; 4) networking; 5) intellectual property and entrepreneurship; 6) literature methods; 7) critical analysis of literature; 8) written and spoken communication; 9) preparation and use of multimedia materials; and 10) origins of the scientific method. Students explore topics and demonstrate mastery through wide ranging activities. Each module includes traditional and non-traditional learning methods. As an example, Table 1 summarizes the Ethical and Responsible Conduct module, listing learning outcomes, measures, activities, and assessments. Students complete readings drawn, when possible, from industry sources like Optics and Photonics News, SPIE Professional magazine, Physics Today, IEEE Spectrum, and others. Students answer questions about readings in discussion threads that promote peer-to-peer learning,[4] and they hear from invited speakers (Fig. 2), visit local companies, and interact directly with local industry leaders. Table 1.Ethical-and-Professional-Conduct module, structured to exceed ABET standard: “Graduates have an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.”
Students completes scaffolded assignments that develop communication and professional skills. Some are done in small groups, focused on an independent research topic. These include creating technical and non-technical abstracts, a citation library, research paper, and a multi-media presentation. They also develop a resume and LinkedIn profile and deliver an elevator speech. By semester’s end, each student has a dossier that showcases their understanding of communication skills, interdisciplinarity, and how their technical field connects to manufacturing, sustainability, health and safety, economics, and social needs. All assignments require students to use ethical frameworks and to develop professional connections within the class and to external contacts. The success of the method is evinced by overwhelmingly positive comments appearing in Student Perception of Instruction. 3.Study of Ethics EnculturationFunded by NSF (grant no. 2024296), the authors are investigating how frameworks like Frontiers in Optics affect students’ training in STEM and whether students’ personal values are reflected within, refracted by, or reciprocally shaped through disciplinary frameworks. Models will be developed to understand how relationships between individual values and normative frameworks affect the “Three Rs:” Recruitment, Retention, and Responsibility. 4.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by National Science Foundation grants no. 2024296 and 1711356. 5.5.ReferencesB. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland,
“Applied ethics in the engineering, health, business, and law professions: A comparison,”
J. Eng Ed, 98 377
–388
(2009). Google Scholar
K. D. Pimple, Research Ethics, Taylor and Francis,2008). Google Scholar
L. Floridi and A. Strait,
“Ethical foresight analysis: what is it and why is it needed?,”
Minds and Machines, 30 77
–97
(2020). Google Scholar
C. F. Wood,
“The effects of creating psychological ownership among students in group projects,”
J. Market. Educ, 25 241
–249
(2003). Google Scholar
|