Paper
1 July 1990 Comparative evaluation of reporting analog films versus digital image using IRIS
S. Millward, Shawn Currie, Garry Belanger, Marjorie Coristine, Jo W. Tombaugh
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
A controlled experiment which simulated the standard reporting practices used by radiologists was performed on IRIS to (1) assess the quality of reporting using digital images and (2) evaluate the use of enhancement tools. Reports generated by 5 experienced radiologists using IRIS were compared to reports generated by the same radiologists using analog films on the same emergency department cases at least seven months earlier. In 100 cases, nine findings were missed using IRIS and 14 new findings were identified using IRIS. To make diagnoses, enhancements which caused the image to be darker and increased contrast were most frequently used. There was no systematic relationship between the enhancement tools used and different types of cases.
© (1990) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
S. Millward, Shawn Currie, Garry Belanger, Marjorie Coristine, and Jo W. Tombaugh "Comparative evaluation of reporting analog films versus digital image using IRIS", Proc. SPIE 1232, Medical Imaging IV: Image Capture and Display, (1 July 1990); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.18836
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
IRIS Consortium

Analog electronics

Image enhancement

Bone

Chest

Diagnostics

Medical imaging

Back to Top