Paper
18 June 1993 Photosensitizer dosage: mg/kg or mg/m2 of body surface?
James S. McCaughan M.D., Cynthia Miller
Author Affiliations +
Proceedings Volume 1881, Optical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy II; (1993) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.146320
Event: OE/LASE'93: Optics, Electro-Optics, and Laser Applications in Scienceand Engineering, 1993, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Abstract
The effect of different doses of the photosensitizer dihematoporphyrin ether (DHE) on the percent decrease of obstruction by endobronchial tumors produced by photodynamic therapy (PDT) was compared on the basis of mg/kg of body weight and mg/m2 of body surface. We found statistically significant differences in the effect of different mg/m2 when there was no difference when compared on the basis of mg/kg of body weight. There was an increase and then a decrease in the effectiveness as the mg/m2 increased. We do not know how to interpret this. However, mg/m2 provides a better parameter for effectiveness and we are now using 60 mg/m2 of DHE for treating endobronchial tumors on the same day as the injection.
© (1993) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
James S. McCaughan M.D. and Cynthia Miller "Photosensitizer dosage: mg/kg or mg/m2 of body surface?", Proc. SPIE 1881, Optical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy II, (18 June 1993); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.146320
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photodynamic therapy

Tumors

Tumor growth modeling

Magnesium

Bronchoscopy

Laser therapeutics

Lithium

Back to Top