Paper
5 January 2006 A critical comparison and development of nano-mechanical characterization of MEMS/NEMS thin film materials
Johnny H. He, H. R. Le, J. K. Luo, Y. Q. Fu, D. F. Moore
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
This paper compared the three different methods for determination of thin film modulus or MEMS applications: 1) scanning bending cantilever, 2) nanoindentation and 3) resonance frequency method. Surface profilometer was used to scan along the micro-machined cantilevers at different loads and produce the bending profile, from which the Youngss modulus can be extracted. Indentation profiled produced by Nano-indenter can deduce Young's modulus and hardness of the thin film materials. AFM vibrometer is used to detect the resonance of the thin film cantilever, from which the stiffness, and therefore the Young's modulus can be derived. The material properties of silicon nitride characterized by three methods are consistent and comparable with one another. The following MEMS materials: SiN, Ni, Ni/SiN bimorph, Nano-Diamond, SiC have been characterized and compared by using different method. Their advantages and disadvantages are also discussed.
© (2006) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Johnny H. He, H. R. Le, J. K. Luo, Y. Q. Fu, and D. F. Moore "A critical comparison and development of nano-mechanical characterization of MEMS/NEMS thin film materials", Proc. SPIE 6111, Reliability, Packaging, Testing, and Characterization of MEMS/MOEMS V, 61110T (5 January 2006); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.647295
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Thin films

Microelectromechanical systems

Diamond

Silicon

Nickel

Profilometers

Silicon carbide

Back to Top