Basic theory on surface measurement uncertainty of 3D imaging systems

J. Angelo Beraldin

doi:10.1117/12.804700

19 January 2009 Basic theory on surface measurement uncertainty of 3D imaging systems

J. Angelo Beraldin

Proceedings Volume 7239, Three-Dimensional Imaging Metrology; 723902 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.804700
Event: IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 2009, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging systems are now widely available, but standards, best practices and comparative data have started to appear only in the last 10 years or so. The need for standards is mainly driven by users and product developers who are concerned with 1) the applicability of a given system to the task at hand (fit-for-purpose), 2) the ability to fairly compare across instruments, 3) instrument warranty issues, 4) costs savings through 3D imaging. The evaluation and characterization of 3D imaging sensors and algorithms require the definition of metric performance. The performance of a system is usually evaluated using quality parameters such as spatial resolution/uncertainty/accuracy and complexity. These are quality parameters that most people in the field can agree upon. The difficulty arises from defining a common terminology and procedures to quantitatively evaluate them though metrology and standards definitions. This paper reviews the basic principles of 3D imaging systems. Optical triangulation and time delay (timeof- flight) measurement systems were selected to explain the theoretical and experimental strands adopted in this paper. The intrinsic uncertainty of optical distance measurement techniques, the parameterization of a 3D surface and systematic errors are covered. Experimental results on a number of scanners (Surphaser®, HDS6000®, Callidus CPW 8000®, ShapeGrabber® 102) support the theoretical descriptions.

Citation Download Citation

J. Angelo Beraldin "Basic theory on surface measurement uncertainty of 3D imaging systems", Proc. SPIE 7239, Three-Dimensional Imaging Metrology, 723902 (19 January 2009); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.804700

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available